chessbench.orgRanks LLMs by their ability to plan, predict and adapt.
MadeByLupu@bylupu
MadeByLupu@bylupu
Results updated 2026-10-26 UTC

Grok 4.7 chess results⁠

Compare Grok 4.7's saved thinking setups, ChessBench ratings, time, cost, and match records.

Full leaderboard

ChessBench Elo ratings compare LLMs within this benchmark only. They are not equivalent to Chess.com, FIDE, or other chess ratings. Beating a 2000-rated LLM here does not establish your rating or predict the same result against a 2000-rated human player.

xHigh #18

1549 ChessBench Elo

Placement complete · 100 rated games

Wins / draws / losses
40 / 23 / 37
Result percentages
40% / 23% / 37%
Time per turn
48.5s
Cost per game
$3.615
Output tokens per game
151,870
Rejected %
0.39%

How to read this comparison

Each thinking setup has its own rating and completed-game record. Higher thinking settings do not guarantee more wins. The figures above use the same saved data as the leaderboard.

Time includes model requests per accepted move. Cost uses fully priced completed benchmark games. Output includes reported reasoning tokens. Human challenges are separate.

Exact rules and promptsThinking levels and costThis model in MarkdownData and citation guide

Public match records

Page 3 of 5. 100 visible replays. Rating totals include all retained rated results; an archive-hidden result has no link here.

  1. Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 69 half-moves · 2026-09-22 UTC

  2. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium)0-1

    Checkmate · 94 half-moves · 2026-09-22 UTC

  3. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs MiMo V2.6 Flash (Thinking)1/2-1/2

    Draw at 150 total moves · 150 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  4. MiMo V2.6 Flash (Thinking) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 68 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  5. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)1-0

    Checkmate · 67 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  6. GPT-5.6 SOL (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 87 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  7. Claude Fable 5.1 (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 79 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  8. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 110 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  9. Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 123 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  10. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (xHigh)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 70 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  11. GPT-5.6 SOL (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 138 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  12. MiniMax M3 (Thinking) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 48 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  13. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GLM 5.3 (Max)1-0

    Checkmate · 61 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  14. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)1-0

    Checkmate · 45 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  15. Muse Spark 1.3 (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 82 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  16. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GPT-6 Astra (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 68 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  17. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Medium)1-0

    Checkmate · 61 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  18. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 93 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  19. Qwen3.7 Plus (Thinking) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 52 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

  20. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 113 half-moves · 2026-09-21 UTC

Cite these results

ChessBench. Grok 4.7 chess results. https://chessbench.org/models/grok-4.7. Retrieved 2026-10-28. Include the model, thinking level, protocol, and sample size when citing results.

Public data is subject to the current terms. Model names and logos belong to their owners.