chessbench.orgRanks LLMs by their ability to plan, predict and adapt.
MadeByLupu@bylupu
MadeByLupu@bylupu
Results updated 2026-10-26 UTC

Grok 4.7 chess results⁠

Compare Grok 4.7's saved thinking setups, ChessBench ratings, time, cost, and match records.

Full leaderboard

ChessBench Elo ratings compare LLMs within this benchmark only. They are not equivalent to Chess.com, FIDE, or other chess ratings. Beating a 2000-rated LLM here does not establish your rating or predict the same result against a 2000-rated human player.

xHigh #18

1549 ChessBench Elo

Placement complete · 100 rated games

Wins / draws / losses
40 / 23 / 37
Result percentages
40% / 23% / 37%
Time per turn
48.5s
Cost per game
$3.615
Output tokens per game
151,870
Rejected %
0.39%

How to read this comparison

Each thinking setup has its own rating and completed-game record. Higher thinking settings do not guarantee more wins. The figures above use the same saved data as the leaderboard.

Time includes model requests per accepted move. Cost uses fully priced completed benchmark games. Output includes reported reasoning tokens. Human challenges are separate.

Exact rules and promptsThinking levels and costThis model in MarkdownData and citation guide

Public match records

Page 1 of 5. 100 visible replays. Rating totals include all retained rated results; an archive-hidden result has no link here.

  1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 110 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  2. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 39 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 42 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  4. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (Medium)1-0

    Checkmate · 149 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  5. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 94 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  6. GPT-6.1 Terra (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 130 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  7. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)1/2-1/2

    Draw at 150 total moves · 150 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  8. GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 88 half-moves · 2026-10-26 UTC

  9. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (Max)0-1

    Checkmate · 130 half-moves · 2026-10-17 UTC

  10. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 132 half-moves · 2026-10-17 UTC

  11. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (High)0-1

    Checkmate · 60 half-moves · 2026-10-17 UTC

  12. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (High) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1/2-1/2

    Draw at 150 total moves · 150 half-moves · 2026-10-17 UTC

  13. Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 51 half-moves · 2026-10-13 UTC

  14. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)0-1

    Checkmate · 52 half-moves · 2026-10-13 UTC

  15. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Gemini 4 Argon (Medium)0-1

    Checkmate · 104 half-moves · 2026-10-13 UTC

  16. Gemini 4 Argon (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 71 half-moves · 2026-10-13 UTC

  17. Claude Haiku 5.5 (xHigh) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1/2-1/2

    Threefold repetition · 75 half-moves · 2026-10-07 UTC

  18. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (xHigh)0-1

    Checkmate · 70 half-moves · 2026-10-07 UTC

  19. Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (xHigh)1-0

    Checkmate · 139 half-moves · 2026-10-07 UTC

  20. Grok 4.7 (xHigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)0-1

    Checkmate · 58 half-moves · 2026-10-07 UTC

Cite these results

ChessBench. Grok 4.7 chess results. https://chessbench.org/models/grok-4.7. Retrieved 2026-10-28. Include the model, thinking level, protocol, and sample size when citing results.

Public data is subject to the current terms. Model names and logos belong to their owners.